Skip to main content

Thoughts - Part IV

Retirement. This is the golden period of a lifetime of hard work, when one can actually enjoy a few of life's comforts without the confines of everyday work. It is a period celebrated by society.  It is a time of a few good years before death.  You are out of the game, having done what you have done, having said what could be said, and having lived in the active world swirling about you.  It is not a time for youth, just beginning their venture. Yet, many young folks live a portion of the retirement live - the relaxing and doing little but without reflection and with few memories, without goals and without drive.  Text-ing and Twitter-ing do not make a life, past or present, and never will.


Current Legislation.  It was considered landmark legislation when a bill was passed and signed to allow the FAA to move around money to avert serious airport delays owing to traffic controller furloughs.   While Congress was giving itself high-fives on a job well done, the United States citizenry was unimpressed.  Indeed, this achievement is something like telling your parents that while you couldn’t tidy up the house after school you did manage to put the cap back on the toothpaste.

Political Compromise.  It is one thing not to compromise on the basis of a strongly held principle, but quite another not to compromise when you have forgotten how.


Liberals and Conservatives.  Who says liberals and conservatives cannot get along together?  Here we see a picture of the San Francisco Chronicle building on Fifth and Mission, in the downtown, completed sometime before 1924.
It has a beautiful stone-faced facade and a rather classic architecture.  It is kept in excellent repair.  You must admit the image shows its design to be rather conservative, even for its time.  The building is populated by the San Francisco Chronicle editorial staff, mostly rather liberal.  Yet, both get along quite well.  Now there we have an example to build upon :)

Thinking.  Some people should just not be allowed to think!  Know any?

Rich man - poor man.  Right now I'm at a meeting in San Francisco, in fact the annual AERA (American Educational Research Association) meeting.  I'm staying on the 25th floor of the Parc 55 hotel.  Nice hotel.  This morning, I left the hotel for a little walk to the West, and within two blocks I was knee deep in street people.  No jobs, no money, no prospects.  This afternoon, I walked a little to the East.  I was in the land of influence and shops stocked with the finest imported goods.  As always, there were street people, but in smaller numbers, all begging for dimes and quarters, where just an ice cream in the local shop cost nine dollars.  San Francisco is a city living at once in squalid poverty and total luxury - each within a stone's throw of the other.  OK. We know this.  But I'm not the first to write this piece.    It has been written almost the same over the centuries many times and in many ways about many cities having a quiescent impoverished class and a garish wealthy class.  This nexus of squalor and luxury has been the subject of many hundreds of novels.  It seems like humanity recognizes it, accepts it, and yet is fascinated and horrified by it - all simultaneously.

Too poor and never rich. Once a people are too poor and too beaten and too downtrodden, they have not the inclination, nor resources, nor ability to improve themselves.  To the rich, they are invisible.   BUT, and this is a big but, many of those in poverty let it happen, some assuming that life would be a sequence of upgrades-without-effort. It isn't.  I'm not sure of the percentage of folks, but it is a sizable percentage of people that will live in perpetuity with government offered living assistance, a government offered food allowance, with no thought of rising up in the society.  In fact, doing nothing for a lifetime is just fine.

Comfortable subsistence is a life.

Over-achiever, under-achiever - un-achiever? It is a myth we are all over-achievers, or even achievers.  It is important to understand that many are non-achievers, and moreover, not-want-to-be achievers.  Achievement is just not in their lexicon.  Simply recall your school days and your fellow students.  Some cared much, some cared not at all. Some worked, some didn't.  These are signatures of a lifetime.  It is a myth that the preponderance of people are willing to work hard, to take risks so as to achieve something, anything.  It is a fact that as long as food is on the table, there is a bed to sleep in, and a TV in the living room,  doing nothing is a personally acceptable life-style.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view