Skip to main content

The Yellow Card in American Sports

Mostly this note applies to American football and hockey - and a little to basketball.  This issue at hand is roughness, and indeed (very) unnecessary roughness.

By way of background, in soccer the "Yellow Card" is applied to cite an egregious foul against an opponent.  This puts the offender on notice that one more such violation is a second yellow card and thus a red card implying ejection from  the game.  Thus the recipient of said card must be most cautious about future fouls.  The procedure works, and it works well.  The concomitant sanction is that the red card recipient is barred from at least the next game.  There are only rare second yellow card violations, and the game, though rough, is a lot cleaner than it could be.  Mind you, soccer is a sport of both skill and strength, of many bumps and bruises, of serious injuries despite possible sanctions.

Note, for athletes, playing the game is not just important, it is the only thing there is!!

In America football, there are numerous severe violations, notably unnecessary roughness, "clotheslining," and many others.  The consequence, except in the most severe cases, is a 15 yard penalty.  In severe cases there is a nominal fine - far less than one games' pay.   Rough play is therefore only slightly, only somewhat discouraged.  In hockey, there is a possible penalty period for serious aggression.  But I do mean serious.  In
American basketball, there is in effect a yellow card system, though the recipient gets four chances before the "red" is issued, and one is issued for each and every foul, not the more stringent egregious foul. Only the fourth foul is tantamount to a yellow card.

If these sports were more serious about both competitive and clean play, they would institute a single yellow card, two and you're ejected, system. (But not to remove the slot.)  They do not.  Rough, dangerous play is encouraged - therefore we see lots of it. Two strikes and you're out works well in the international sport of soccer - the world's premier sport.  It could work well in the USA, as well.   

Cleaning up the sports means imposing serious sanctions against egregious rule violators.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view