Skip to main content

The Yellow Card in American Sports

Mostly this note applies to American football and hockey - and a little to basketball.  This issue at hand is roughness, and indeed (very) unnecessary roughness.

By way of background, in soccer the "Yellow Card" is applied to cite an egregious foul against an opponent.  This puts the offender on notice that one more such violation is a second yellow card and thus a red card implying ejection from  the game.  Thus the recipient of said card must be most cautious about future fouls.  The procedure works, and it works well.  The concomitant sanction is that the red card recipient is barred from at least the next game.  There are only rare second yellow card violations, and the game, though rough, is a lot cleaner than it could be.  Mind you, soccer is a sport of both skill and strength, of many bumps and bruises, of serious injuries despite possible sanctions.

Note, for athletes, playing the game is not just important, it is the only thing there is!!

In America football, there are numerous severe violations, notably unnecessary roughness, "clotheslining," and many others.  The consequence, except in the most severe cases, is a 15 yard penalty.  In severe cases there is a nominal fine - far less than one games' pay.   Rough play is therefore only slightly, only somewhat discouraged.  In hockey, there is a possible penalty period for serious aggression.  But I do mean serious.  In
American basketball, there is in effect a yellow card system, though the recipient gets four chances before the "red" is issued, and one is issued for each and every foul, not the more stringent egregious foul. Only the fourth foul is tantamount to a yellow card.

If these sports were more serious about both competitive and clean play, they would institute a single yellow card, two and you're ejected, system. (But not to remove the slot.)  They do not.  Rough, dangerous play is encouraged - therefore we see lots of it. Two strikes and you're out works well in the international sport of soccer - the world's premier sport.  It could work well in the USA, as well.   

Cleaning up the sports means imposing serious sanctions against egregious rule violators.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

  Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1.       Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty.   This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...

Robin Hood and Cliven Bundy

  Actor Herbert Mundin, playing Munch in the 1938 film The Adventures of Robin Hood (starring Errol Flynn) is charged by Prince John's troops of slaying a royal deer in the royal Sherwood forest.  The punishment is death.  Though the events of this film are a portrayal of events dating to the 15th century, they became by the 19th century a "robbing from the rich for the poor" theme so often depicted in other film genres. The William Tell legend is another. The plot is simple.  A poor man desperate to survive tastes the forbidden fruits owned by the authority, and is condemned. I would love to hear this event debated on the current TV news shows.  On the one hand, Munch would be a champion in service to his family.  On the other hand, his legal rights are restricted by legal authority. so, the argument would proceed.  Legal scholars cite statutes chapter and verse, while others would root for the common man.  Fast forward to 2014. Parallels ...