Skip to main content

The Three R's

Three Simple Words

Remember these from our school days, reading, writing, and arithmetic, the basic three R’s? They encapsulate much of our school subjects, and are among the very important things we have learned. More generally, they point a way we classify important ideas and directions in a simple and memorable way.

It is the way we work; it is who we are.

Let’s generalize. Nowadays, with our incredibly complex lives which include just plain living, politics, education, workplace, and more, we need simplicity to keep everything straight, as it were “all in our heads at the same time.” We need simple rules for complex subjects, partly because there are so many of them.

The Questions. How do we, as a people, transmit, contain, understand, remember, and reflect upon, information and ideas? How do we understand the drivers of ongoing initiatives? How do we relate to a subject? How do we express the rules of the game, our game?

The Answers. In part... We place our ideas, our pathways, our rules, our methodologies into simple little boxes with labels. These labels, usually a few, like three, have high-value words to describe them. These words should be simple and self-explanatory. These are open to interpretation, and this gains them great popularity as each participant can give individual interpretations.   Yet, the collective all view themselves unified.

Alliteration is important as a memory and cognitive devise. Words that begin with the same letter are more effective, more memorable, and more substantive. Three R’s, Five E’s, etc. If your containers (boxes) all begin with the same letter, this increases their potency and believability.  They impart, crazy as it sounds, a level of "truth."

Single word. Often a single word is not enough. This is an overly tight container for transmission of an idea. Two, three, or more words are better as they expand the idea giving it a higher dimensionality and focus points for understanding. Too many words diminish the concept, muddle the idea, and confuse interpretation.

Surveys. Often you are asked to classify and categorize your views on a single question. Responses ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree are frequent and clarify what is requested. Ten point scales are ineffective.

Political campaigns are usually cast in a few simple words. Good examples include Safe[ty] and Security; Tippecanoe and Tyler Too; Safer Streets, Stronger Community; Hope and Change; overly simple slogans or longish expressions that are less powerful  include, Forward, A Change We Can Believe in, Proven, Quality, Strength, Leadership, Experience, Let's Make a Difference.   A slogan not easily encapsulated, yet not overly, is ineffective. Ditto for an entire program.

The words used are many and varied. They form the containers of our comprehension and importantly our ability to remember what we believe and do.  They illustrate a number of foundations: (a) progressions of progress, (b) containment of a world view, and (c) a method with feedback loop. Not all are in three’s, and not all begin with the letter “R.” All summarize simply the encapsulation of what is intended. All give the guideposts of what to believe, how to believe it, how to achieve it, and how to succeed. Nonetheless, we use here three "R" words to summarize our intent in this note, namely to reflect, remember, and reprise.

There are Three X's for just about every topic imaginable.  Broad categories include education politics, military business sports, choice, life, and more.  Simply Google "Three X's" for an "X" of your choice.  Below are a very few specific examples of how three or more words can describe a full program of thought,  philosophy, or action. The letters and words change but the ideas are easily remembered and readily transmitted.
  • School Days: Reading, Writing, Arithmetic (reading, ‘riting, and ‘rithmetic). The all-time classic.
  • K-12 math education: Rigor, Relationships, Relevance
  • Higher-Education: Recruitment, remediation, and retention
  • Natural Healing Techniques: Reiki, Relaxation and Reflexology or Rest, Relaxation, Rejuvenation
  • Insomnia: Relaxation, Restricted (Sleep), Reconditioning
  • Swimming: Rhythm, Range, Relaxation, Repetition 
  • Child Birth: Relaxation, Rhythm, Ritual
  • Resorts or Location Slogans: Restaurants, Recreation, Relaxation OR  Rest, Relaxation, Reflection
  • Personal Living: Responsibility, Running, Relaxation
  • Dating: Available, Agreeable, Accessible
  • Accountability in Education: Responsiveness, Responsibility, Readiness
  • Environment: Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle
  • Pedagogy: Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, Evaluate
  • War: Reconstruction, Recovery, Renewal
  • Case Formalisms, Object Oriented Analysis and Design, Unified Modeling Language, Domain Modeling: Realization, Refinement, Reification
  • Personal Learning: Engage, Explore, Enjoy, Extend, Extrapolate*
  • Presidential: Patriotism, Protection, and Prosperity (McKinley) , Compassionate Conservatism, Putting People First, I Like Ike, Peace and Prosperity, Hope and Change
  • Sports: Release, Review, Reset or Recognize, Regroup, Refocus
  • Choice: Right, Responsibility, Results
  • Marketing: Aim, Act, Access
As we are in an election cycle (like we are most of the time), take a quick look at McKinley's triad, Patriotism, Protection, and Prosperity. These encapsulate the secular world of most people. Most people believe in a strong country and good citizens, imagining themselves as the same. They do want a material level of comfort, and they wish to be secure in their lives. They alliterate, non have a pejorative connotation, all are memorable collectively, and all are high comfort words. So, for example, "Strength, Wealth, Security" could not convey the same memorable meaning.

_____________________
Please Google any of these for definitions and meanings.

More at *http:/used-ideas.blogspot.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view