The Cost of National Friendships

Note: I try hard to keep politics out of this blog. This one may seems to plunge right into politics, but as it applies to at least the last four presidents, two Democrats and two Republications, it is at any rate not partisan.

In his 1810 book, Aphorisms on Man, Manners, Principles and Things*, Joseph Barlett pens the following on friendship between nations.

National friendship never existed. Interest

is the basis of all their connections. So long

as any nation's glory and resources are

aided and advanced by another kingdom,

so long, and no longer, will they be in amity.

This has been a guidepost for understanding other nations interests for centuries. As long as the money is flowing, we are friends. This is not to say "true" friends, but that is well understood. The country giving the aid is often reviled by the recipient at the population level. While the aid giving country is praised an revered at the national and diplomatic level, frequently the public citizen will say privately, "Those people are merely idiots with big money. They are dominating, insensitive, stealing from under us our beloved culture, and making us into them."

In the past several years, the foreign aid game has changed. Our country is now in a position that it continues to give massive aid to countries that openly revile us, that defy us, and that spare no effort to mislead and misdirect us. While making tepid lip-service of support and friendliness in our language they defile us in their own. Yet we continue with respect and deference, to aid countries that denounce us. An obvious feedback loop is working; but questions are apparent.

Has our country decided it is best to support the lessor of the evils? (Most generous explanation I can think of.)
Is our country's foreign policy and strength now so weak that no penalty for open defiance is perceived by aid recipients?
Has our country designed other countries as "too big to fail," "to important to isolate," or something like that? The State Department uses code words "in our strategic interests." There is merit here.
Are some of the recipient countries among those we simply want to help?
Do the recipient countries sense they have something to bargain for continued largess and press the point through innuendo and threats? Is their perception that we are merely paying for whatever services they might give?

While the effectiveness of foreign aid is actively debated, the United States continues to pump around $54 billion in aid to other countries each year. The money to be pumped this year (FY2012) in FY2013 dollars is 32% higher than in FY2003. ( Note, the increase is very far from linear, and happily, because of the budget crisis, Congress has restricted growth in the last four years, most specifically the last two.) Below is a list of the top 10** recipients for this fiscal year and those estimated for the next fiscal year. How many of these countries are our friends?

Foreign Aid (in millions)

Fiscal perspective. Just how much is $54b? Often, foreign aid is highlighted as a tiny fraction of the US Federal budget. Maybe only 1-2%. However, in terms of the fifty states***, it is greater than the annual expenditures of all states except California (~$87b) and NY (~$56b); amazingly, it amounts to about 8.2% of all state expenditures combined. Moreover, from smallest to largest, this amount exceeds the total state expenditures of the first seventeen states.

In the recent movie, Used Cars (1980), there is the perfect line, "It used to be when you bought a politician, they'd stay bought."

One form of really good foreign aid that has worked now for at least two full generations is that of student foreign aid for foreign nationals to study in US universities. It forms life-long bonds between people here and over there. It generally creates pro-American professionals.

* This book is available free on Google Books. See at books.google.com
** State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs: FY2013 Budget and Appropriations, Congressional Research Service, www.crs.gov. See http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R42621.pdf
*** The Fiscal Survey of States, A report by the National Governors Association and
the National Association of State Budget Officers, Spring 2011, See, http://www.nga.org/files/live/sites/NGA/files/pdf/FSS1106.PDF

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1. Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty. This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...

Problem Solving? Then Find Those Gaps

Problem Solving - Finding Gaps 12/28/2024 Introduction. Solving complex problems often arises from the presence of gaps in knowledge, resources, understanding, or perspectives. These gaps introduce uncertainty, ambiguity, or constraints, making solutions difficult to achieve. Below, we explore the primary types of gaps that complicate problem-solving and their implications. Many are of the technical, informational, theoretical, and social nature. You may discover some of these gaps are also sources of uncertainty in problem-solving, in that they supply us with another list of things that can go wrong based on something missing. Gaps also form a type of impossible problem, that will be discussed in a later chapter. Finally, this essay is about all problems and solutions, not just those of science. Contents Comprehension Gaps Consistency Gaps Solution-Type Gaps Invisible Gaps Knowledge and Evidence Gaps Methodological and Technological Gaps Ethical and Cult...

CERTAINTY IS ALSO AN EMOTION

Certainty is also a Feeling Certainty is often viewed as a mental state tied to knowledge and confidence, but it also functions as a feeling with distinct emotional and physiological components. While it arises from cognitive processes, certainty also has a subjective and emotional quality that makes it more than just a rational judgment. It provides a sense of assurance and security that shapes human experience in profound ways. Emotional Dimension . At its core, certainty evokes emotions that influence how we perceive and interact with the world. When someone feels certain, they often experience relief, comfort, or empowerment. These emotions are particularly strong when uncertainty or doubt is resolved, offering a sense of closure. For example, solving a complex problem or having a belief validated by evidence brings not just intellectual satisfaction but also emotional reassurance. Subjectivity. Certainty is inherently personal and subjective. It depends on individual...

First Blog

Search This Blog