Skip to main content

The Cost of National Friendships

Note:  I try hard to keep politics out of this blog.  This one may seems to plunge right into politics, but as it applies to at least the last four presidents, two Democrats and two Republications, it is at any rate not partisan.


In his 1810 book, Aphorisms on Man, Manners, Principles and Things*,  Joseph Barlett pens the following on friendship between nations.
National friendship never existed. Interest
is the basis of all their connections.  So long
 as any nation's glory and resources are 
aided and advanced by another kingdom, 
so long, and no longer, will they be in amity.

This has been a guidepost for understanding other nations interests for centuries.  As long as the money is flowing, we are friends.  This is not to say "true" friends, but that is well understood.  The country giving the aid is often reviled by the recipient at the population level.  While the aid giving country is praised an revered at the national and diplomatic level, frequently the public citizen will say privately, "Those people are merely idiots with big money. They are dominating, insensitive, stealing from under us our beloved culture, and making us into them."

In the past several years, the foreign aid game has changed. Our country is now in a position that it continues to give massive aid to countries that openly revile us, that defy us, and that spare no effort to mislead and misdirect us.  While making tepid lip-service of support and friendliness in our language they defile us in their own.  Yet we continue with respect and deference, to aid countries that denounce us.  An obvious feedback loop is working; but questions are apparent. 
  • Has our country decided it is best to support the lessor of the evils? (Most generous explanation I can think of.)
  • Is our country's foreign policy and strength now so weak that no penalty for open defiance is perceived by aid recipients? 
  • Has our country designed other countries as "too big to fail," "to important to isolate," or something like that?   The State Department uses code words "in our strategic interests."  There is merit here.
  • Are some of the recipient countries among those we simply want to help?  
  • Do the recipient countries sense they have something to bargain for continued largess and press the point through innuendo and threats?  Is their perception that we are merely paying for whatever services they might give?
While the effectiveness of foreign aid is actively debated, the United States continues to pump around $54 billion in aid to other countries each year.   The money to be pumped this year (FY2012) in FY2013 dollars is 32% higher than in FY2003.  ( Note, the increase is very far from linear, and happily, because of the budget crisis, Congress has restricted growth in the last four years, most specifically the last two.)    Below is a list of the top 10** recipients for this fiscal year and those estimated for the next fiscal year.  How many of these countries are our friends?
Foreign Aid (in millions)

Fiscal perspective.  Just how much is $54b?  Often, foreign aid is highlighted as a tiny fraction of the US Federal budget.  Maybe only 1-2%.  However, in terms of the fifty states***, it is greater than the annual expenditures of all states except California (~$87b) and NY (~$56b); amazingly, it amounts to about 8.2% of all state expenditures combined.  Moreover, from smallest to largest, this amount exceeds the total state expenditures of the first seventeen states.

In the recent movie, Used Cars (1980), there is the perfect line, "It used to be when you bought a politician, they'd stay bought."  

One form of really good foreign aid that has worked now for at least two full generations is that of student foreign aid for foreign nationals to study in US universities.  It forms life-long bonds between people here and over there.  It generally creates  pro-American professionals.

* This book is available free on Google Books. See at books.google.com
** State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs: FY2013 Budget and Appropriations, Congressional Research Service, www.crs.gov. See http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R42621.pdf  
*** The Fiscal Survey of States, A report by the National Governors Association and
the National Association of State Budget Officers, Spring 2011,  See,
http://www.nga.org/files/live/sites/NGA/files/pdf/FSS1106.PDF

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...