Skip to main content

On Aging - Part III Age and Trust

Whether you support either Governor Romney or President Obama, whether you have strong political views favoring one or the other, whether you don't really care who wins, there is one aspect of this political race that is missing all news coverage.  It is Age.

Gov. Romney is 65 years old, putting him at the traditional retirement age for most people.  This age of retirement is when folks, having worked a lifetime, can take moments to reflect on life, enjoy their family, read a few books, and otherwise take it easy.  Romney, at this same age, is competing for the most stressful job on earth.  It is one of those 24/7 jobs where just one misstep can cost billions in dollars, millions in jobs, and thousands in lives. This job allows its holder to set long term trajectories for a powerful nation, arguably the most powerful nation on earth.

Yet, his age has not been a factor at all.  The beautiful thing here is that the age of 65 seems not to be important as a foundational criterion for job suitability.  It was a considered factor for the election of Dwight Eisenhower, who was elected at the age of 63, but his stature was immense and his opponent was weak.  More recently, Ronald Reagan was aged 69 at his inauguration. Age was often mentioned as a factor.  As I recall, John F. Kennedy took hits on both his youth (Age again) and religion. 

There is another factor of age never mentioned but is important in the hearts of the people. It is Trust.  If someone this age is competing for a high level job, most people feel confident this is the job they want, to protect and serve, to guide and enhance, to maintain and sustain.  There is trust that no hidden agenda lurks in the background. 

This is singularly remarkable for a country that worships youth and physical attractiveness. 

An interesting note is that in our era, the three youngest elected presidents (Kennedy, Clinton, and Obama) were Democrats, while the three oldest elected presidents (Eisenhower, Reagan, and Bush) were Republicans.  As interesting is the fact these presidencies somewhat interlaced in time.  It seems our country vacillates between two types of leaders:  the steady but trusted vs. the hopeful but untested.  These seem to be distinguished by age.  My guess is that if President Obama prevails, the country still senses a need for more hope.  On the other hand, if Governor Romney wins, the country senses a need for the more steady course.  We will see very soon. 

A full list of president's ages at inauguration can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States_by_age

http://used-ideas.blogspot.com/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view