Skip to main content

Smart People

Preamble. There is one achievement of the US educational system.  They have convinced our students of how smart they are. This is good and bad.  Some students are elevated by this pronouncement, and get smarter.  Some students are elevated by this pronouncement, and don't try to get smarter. Why bother, they might ask when I'm already smart?  Some of these folks are idiots.

In this note, we classify students and adults by their intellectual capacities. This applies well beyond the USA.

Fundamental premise:  "Every body thinks they're smart."  Not really!

Rankings. Smart vs Dumb
  1. Smart and know they're smart but don't press the "smart" issue.
  2. Smart and know they're smart, but do try to impress their smartness.
  3. Smart, but don't know it, are insecure about the whole matter. 
  4. Smart but doubt their smartness.
  5. Not so smart but think they're smart. Act like they're smart.
  6. Not so smart and know it.  They work around the matter.
  7. Dumb but think they're smart. Dangerous types
  8. Dumb but are too dumb to know it. Very dangerous.
  9. Dumb and don't even consider the matter.
  10. Dolts. The bottom.
Are you smart?  Where do you fit in this?  I know where I am and its not at the top, even second, third, or fourth. The are you smart test: Just try to compete in any particular arena and prove you stand out on top.  Being a generalist doesn't count here unless you really are one and can prove it.  Totally rare.
Naturally, these categories are just a first cut.  Please add on as you think.

http://used-ideas.blogspot.com/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Human Simulation is Possible - by Humans

  Human Simulation: Agent-Based Modeling and the Computational Case for Our Reality   1.       Introduction In the essay, we introduce the notion that humanity could be a deliberate simulation based on an extremely simple single-celled organism, hardly anything more complex than that. This will allow an (apparently) new interpretation of the notion that humanity is simulated, but that there is no master engineer at a massive number of dials and switches, responsible for every twist and turn of our universe and lives. We begin with the notion that the universe exists and operates under its own laws. So, given the Earth [2] , when and where life first began, it was infused with a living agent, self-actualized, reproductive, and with other basic rules for its operations, interactions, and much of what single-celled organisms do today. The idea from this occurred some years back when writing code in ActionScript (formerly Flash), I was able to create...

The Calculus of Ideas and Patterns

  Introduction. When dealing with ideas, patterns, intuition, and brainstorming, we need operations or rules not unlike those of arithmetic. The goal is not proof, a finished device, or a fait accompli , but rather a foundation for further investigation and study. In some cases, these operations may yield a proposition, that is, something capable of being proved. In this sense, they form a practical logic of intuition. The article concludes with a few select examples from a variety of venues. Setting. We are working with a given idea, problem, or project, or simply just thinking. Our aim is to discover pathways, patterns, or conceptual connections that may be useful. The following operations describe ways in which ideas and patterns can be generated, transformed, or refined. These also work toward understanding the imagination. Yet, this framework is distinguished from formal logic and proof. We are tempted to call them as “soft logic” because while nothing is proved, reasons...

Freedom of Speech

  Think of freedom of speech as a living organism. Then think of what is required for it to survive. Coming to mind are a population agreeable to its constitution (its environment) and the institutions (its nutrients) that keep it healthy. Currently, many institutions, including some political parties, question unfettered freedom of speech and are working to deny it, claiming it is unhealthy for the body politic. Yes? No?