Skip to main content

Smart People

Preamble. There is one achievement of the US educational system.  They have convinced our students of how smart they are. This is good and bad.  Some students are elevated by this pronouncement, and get smarter.  Some students are elevated by this pronouncement, and don't try to get smarter. Why bother, they might ask when I'm already smart?  Some of these folks are idiots.

In this note, we classify students and adults by their intellectual capacities. This applies well beyond the USA.

Fundamental premise:  "Every body thinks they're smart."  Not really!

Rankings. Smart vs Dumb
  1. Smart and know they're smart but don't press the "smart" issue.
  2. Smart and know they're smart, but do try to impress their smartness.
  3. Smart, but don't know it, are insecure about the whole matter. 
  4. Smart but doubt their smartness.
  5. Not so smart but think they're smart. Act like they're smart.
  6. Not so smart and know it.  They work around the matter.
  7. Dumb but think they're smart. Dangerous types
  8. Dumb but are too dumb to know it. Very dangerous.
  9. Dumb and don't even consider the matter.
  10. Dolts. The bottom.
Are you smart?  Where do you fit in this?  I know where I am and its not at the top, even second, third, or fourth. The are you smart test: Just try to compete in any particular arena and prove you stand out on top.  Being a generalist doesn't count here unless you really are one and can prove it.  Totally rare.
Naturally, these categories are just a first cut.  Please add on as you think.

http://used-ideas.blogspot.com/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view