Skip to main content

Teacher Certification and Retention

In this note we are most interested in a singularly important aspect of American education, that of our corps of mathematics teachers.   We look at numbers.  Included in this report are the numbers of new teachers and the all important retention/attrition rates.  

Teacher Certification – New Teachers
As reported by the Texas State Board for Educator Certification, we consider numbers of candidates who received initial Mathematics and Science certifications over the ten fiscal years, 2000-2009.  Important conclusions are
  • Mathematics teachers remained predominantly female and white in all the years under consideration, despite substantial year-by-year changes.
  • About 70% of all newly certified math teachers are female correspondingly 30% are male.
  • By ethnicity, the data reports that 8.76% are African American, 68.33% are white, 16.48% are Hispanic,  5.10% are Asian, 1.05% are Native American, and 2.12% are Other. 
  • The percentage of white Mathematics teachers declined precipitously by more than 10% over this period, while the percentage of Hispanic teachers increased slightly, by about 4%.
  • African American percentage was relatively flat over this period, while the percentage of Asian teachers grew from a low of 2% to currently about 5%.

The actual male-female data is shown in the chart below. 


As a graphic we illustrate the growth of math teachers over the period under consideration. 


The linear regression lines reveal that the numbers of newly certified teachers is rising by about 62 new teachers each year.  Yet, currently this meets only about 50% of the demand.

Retention
Reliable retention data is difficult to find and interpret.  However, a recent report issued by the Sid Richardson Foundation [1] gives a detailed study based on 51 science and math teachers over the past few years.  In this note, however, we use data as reported by Fuller [2].  The shaded region is projected. 

As reported, the attrition rate for Alternatively Certified (ACP) Teachers is fully 14 percentage points higher than for the traditional certification process.  Could this be accounted for by the facts that (1) Entering the teaching profession is often a lofty and idealistic goal, and (2) When the idealism does not pan out, ACP teachers have an alternate profession to fall back upon.  This is a counter explanation to the other oft cited reason that the traditional method better prepares teachers for the duration.  The Richardson study gives similar results.  The teaching is a difficult profession, requiring both intellectual and considerable emotional energy.  As well, new teacher salaries do not reflect the lip service given to the profession.

As a final note, fully 14,25% of high school math teachers are teaching out of field.  This percentage is about half again higher for economically disadvantaged school districts.   Since, in 2008, only 61% of the demand for teachers was met by the supply of teachers, it is little wonder at the high attrition rates and out-of-field teaching assignments.  The demand percentage continues to drop, and is projected at about 50% for 2012.

References
1. 51 Math and Science Teachers in Texas: Motivating, Preparing, Supporting, and Retaining Math and Science Teachers in Texas High Schools, A report by the
Sid W. Richardson Foundation Forum, January 2012, www.sidrichardson.org/51teachers
2. Fuller, E. J. (2008, October). Secondary mathematics and science teachers in Texas: Supply, demand and quality. Austin, TX: Texas Instruments, Inc. and Texas Business Education Council.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Human Simulation is Possible - by Humans

  Human Simulation: Agent-Based Modeling and the Computational Case for Our Reality   1.       Introduction In the essay, we introduce the notion that humanity could be a deliberate simulation based on an extremely simple single-celled organism, hardly anything more complex than that. This will allow an (apparently) new interpretation of the notion that humanity is simulated, but that there is no master engineer at a massive number of dials and switches, responsible for every twist and turn of our universe and lives. We begin with the notion that the universe exists and operates under its own laws. So, given the Earth [2] , when and where life first began, it was infused with a living agent, self-actualized, reproductive, and with other basic rules for its operations, interactions, and much of what single-celled organisms do today. The idea from this occurred some years back when writing code in ActionScript (formerly Flash), I was able to create...

The Calculus of Ideas and Patterns

  Introduction. When dealing with ideas, patterns, intuition, and brainstorming, we need operations or rules not unlike those of arithmetic. The goal is not proof, a finished device, or a fait accompli , but rather a foundation for further investigation and study. In some cases, these operations may yield a proposition, that is, something capable of being proved. In this sense, they form a practical logic of intuition. The article concludes with a few select examples from a variety of venues. Setting. We are working with a given idea, problem, or project, or simply just thinking. Our aim is to discover pathways, patterns, or conceptual connections that may be useful. The following operations describe ways in which ideas and patterns can be generated, transformed, or refined. These also work toward understanding the imagination. Yet, this framework is distinguished from formal logic and proof. We are tempted to call them as “soft logic” because while nothing is proved, reasons...

Freedom of Speech

  Think of freedom of speech as a living organism. Then think of what is required for it to survive. Coming to mind are a population agreeable to its constitution (its environment) and the institutions (its nutrients) that keep it healthy. Currently, many institutions, including some political parties, question unfettered freedom of speech and are working to deny it, claiming it is unhealthy for the body politic. Yes? No?