Skip to main content

Teacher Certification and Retention

In this note we are most interested in a singularly important aspect of American education, that of our corps of mathematics teachers.   We look at numbers.  Included in this report are the numbers of new teachers and the all important retention/attrition rates.  

Teacher Certification – New Teachers
As reported by the Texas State Board for Educator Certification, we consider numbers of candidates who received initial Mathematics and Science certifications over the ten fiscal years, 2000-2009.  Important conclusions are
  • Mathematics teachers remained predominantly female and white in all the years under consideration, despite substantial year-by-year changes.
  • About 70% of all newly certified math teachers are female correspondingly 30% are male.
  • By ethnicity, the data reports that 8.76% are African American, 68.33% are white, 16.48% are Hispanic,  5.10% are Asian, 1.05% are Native American, and 2.12% are Other. 
  • The percentage of white Mathematics teachers declined precipitously by more than 10% over this period, while the percentage of Hispanic teachers increased slightly, by about 4%.
  • African American percentage was relatively flat over this period, while the percentage of Asian teachers grew from a low of 2% to currently about 5%.

The actual male-female data is shown in the chart below. 


As a graphic we illustrate the growth of math teachers over the period under consideration. 


The linear regression lines reveal that the numbers of newly certified teachers is rising by about 62 new teachers each year.  Yet, currently this meets only about 50% of the demand.

Retention
Reliable retention data is difficult to find and interpret.  However, a recent report issued by the Sid Richardson Foundation [1] gives a detailed study based on 51 science and math teachers over the past few years.  In this note, however, we use data as reported by Fuller [2].  The shaded region is projected. 

As reported, the attrition rate for Alternatively Certified (ACP) Teachers is fully 14 percentage points higher than for the traditional certification process.  Could this be accounted for by the facts that (1) Entering the teaching profession is often a lofty and idealistic goal, and (2) When the idealism does not pan out, ACP teachers have an alternate profession to fall back upon.  This is a counter explanation to the other oft cited reason that the traditional method better prepares teachers for the duration.  The Richardson study gives similar results.  The teaching is a difficult profession, requiring both intellectual and considerable emotional energy.  As well, new teacher salaries do not reflect the lip service given to the profession.

As a final note, fully 14,25% of high school math teachers are teaching out of field.  This percentage is about half again higher for economically disadvantaged school districts.   Since, in 2008, only 61% of the demand for teachers was met by the supply of teachers, it is little wonder at the high attrition rates and out-of-field teaching assignments.  The demand percentage continues to drop, and is projected at about 50% for 2012.

References
1. 51 Math and Science Teachers in Texas: Motivating, Preparing, Supporting, and Retaining Math and Science Teachers in Texas High Schools, A report by the
Sid W. Richardson Foundation Forum, January 2012, www.sidrichardson.org/51teachers
2. Fuller, E. J. (2008, October). Secondary mathematics and science teachers in Texas: Supply, demand and quality. Austin, TX: Texas Instruments, Inc. and Texas Business Education Council.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view