Skip to main content

Your Marvelous Brain - Problem Solving


Ever thought about how you figure things out? Your marvelous brain has it covered. Indeed, you use six separate systems to make conclusions, see describe them in this order though it varies from person to person.
  • Beliefs/Faith - You have a set of beliefs and a state of faith, both of which which function as guideposts on how to view problems and resolve difficulties.  These are your strongest system, and can override all other considerations.  The two overlap so much, it isn't really possible to distinguish them.  The first is the second, and the second is the first.
  • Random - When all else fails, and all considerations are equal, what do you do? Throw the dice. This means just take a guess.  We all do this from time to time, usually when there is little time to use your more considered systems to respond.  
  • Analytic - This is the logical part of your brain. It channels you through issues using the strengths of logical deduction and induction. You try hard to use accepted logical rules to make conclusions.
  • Instinct/Intuitive - You have a sense of what to do. It just comes to you. You have to react quickly. So, you rely on instincts of what to do.
  • Programs - Through life you program yourself to carry out certain complex actions. While at one time you used the other tools to draw conclusions or take actions, you now rely on a set of internally programs steps.
  • Emotional - You make a decision based on purely emotional grounds. You "feel" this is the proper recourse and decision because you "know" in your heart this is correct.
Note, these systems do overlap quite a bit. What stands out is when just one system is used. For example, in the television and movie series Star Trek, we saw the constant (and exaggerated) contrast between Dr. Spock's fully analytic method of problem solving with Captain Kirk's rather intuitive methods. It is also clear when someone is acting purely on emotion. In a variation on one of the "Trolley Problems" suppose a trolley is hurtling down the track to a switch which you control. On each branch there is a single hiker, that will certainly be killed if the switch directs the train on that branch. You have no extra information. Which switch do you set? I know this sounds a little gruesome, but try to reason this out in any way other than simply select to randomly (considered the same if no action is taken).

Now consider the local bunny rabbit sitting in your backyard. Someone suddenly appears. The rabbit fears. What does it do? It reacts by instinct alone, though the instinct of flight. It is difficult to see the rabbit using any other system for most any problem. What about sex? Well, this is hormonal - not considered in this note.

Of course, which system or systems you use depends on various factors. Some problems are low information meaning you have incomplete information about the underlying issues. Some are high information lending themselves to a better analysis. Even further, some are complete information from which the analytical is possible. However, all of these are tainted by your personal proclivities, your morals, you ethics, and other socially philosophic tenets you have. How you use your BRAIPE is never clear, the particular situation has an important role.

Trust.  This is a mental facet we rely on completely. Trust is a singular important commodity in the entire animal community.  It transcends and combines your entire mental makeup.  Trust is about survival.  Trust is about success.  Trust is about process.  Without trust, we could not live day-to-day.  Of all six systems, trust combines them all.  Trust is the steady force in life, a third rail of interpersonal communication, decision making, and confidence.  When you are accused of being non trustworthy, this can resonate with the very foundation of how you are considered, and whether you are just plain discounted.  This implies the possibility collective terms of mental functioning not yet discussed. 

Got an opinion?  Please send along.  http://www.used-ideas.blogspot.com

 


Trolley Problems: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_problem
Trolley problems are essentially moral dilemmas and are somewhat "toy" problems posed at the extreme, a situation in which few of us are equipped to handle. Trauma surgeons, in a time of war, do make these decisions, however. It must be difficult.

    Comments

    1. Thank you for these, Don. You deal with important topics in an intelligent way. The best part is that you don't seem to have succumbed to the tide of partisanship and extremism that is overwhelming many people in our country.

      ReplyDelete

    Post a Comment

    Please Comment.

    Popular posts from this blog

    Accepting Fake Information

    Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

    Your Brain Within Your Brain

      Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

    Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

      Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view