Skip to main content

The Telepathy Game

June 17, 2012
The Telepathy Game
Suppose telepathy is possible; that is, human minds can communicate using some mechanism not among the known senses.   There have been lots of suggestions for the mechanism of information transmission and reception, from brain waves of some form, to electromagnetic waves, to quantum effects, and more.  Let’s agree to ignore this part of the story, and simply assume some type of telepathic communication exists in some type of people under some types of circumstances.  We are proposing a thought experiment, something the physicists like to run.

What we consider here are those that may be senders, receivers, both senders and receivers, and neither.   All of the first three categories have something to do with person-to-person interactions; the fourth is not.  A small list follows

  • Senders: teachers, preachers, leaders, actors, parents.
  • Receivers: students, psychologists, doctors, nurses
  • Both senders and receivers: diplomats, politicians
  • Neither:  pharmacist, brick layer, artist, laborer, machinist, skilled tradesmen in general, chemist, engineer

You are free to examine and categorize.

We have considered only professions where there may be other mechanisms for the communication.  The foremost of these is anything toward an intuitive sense of what is being communicated.  This can include body language, voice tone, facial expressions,  and level of interaction.  For the most part, these are visual and aural, though other senses could be involved.  Yet, other channels are possible.

Could it be that many are attracted to an occupation where their particular “telepathic” communication is favored?  The neither category is both important and revealing.

Could it be that the Zener cards are exactly the wrong way to test for telepathy?   See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telepathy.  Viewing such cards is substantially passive.  Perhaps what is needed is a test that more profoundly excites the brain to higher energy states.   Examples: fear, anger, love, ...  Yet, conclusions have been made upon the basis of the non-evidence produced by these experiments.
What about telepathic communication where no personal immediacy is involved?  Possibly, two people become so much alike in thinking that they are more likely than not to arrive at similar conclusions and guesses.  At a distance, “telepathic” communication between random individuals is simply not understood.  But this is not to count it out.  The mind is a most powerful tool, and we’ve only scratched the surface of determining its power and depth.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Human Simulation is Possible - by Humans

  Human Simulation: Agent-Based Modeling and the Computational Case for Our Reality   1.       Introduction In the essay, we introduce the notion that humanity could be a deliberate simulation based on an extremely simple single-celled organism, hardly anything more complex than that. This will allow an (apparently) new interpretation of the notion that humanity is simulated, but that there is no master engineer at a massive number of dials and switches, responsible for every twist and turn of our universe and lives. We begin with the notion that the universe exists and operates under its own laws. So, given the Earth [2] , when and where life first began, it was infused with a living agent, self-actualized, reproductive, and with other basic rules for its operations, interactions, and much of what single-celled organisms do today. The idea from this occurred some years back when writing code in ActionScript (formerly Flash), I was able to create...

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 

Infinity of Theories

I do love the Stock Markets, all of them.   Why?   Because of the abundance of theories.    Every day, no matter how the market moves there are dozens of pundits offering forth their theory as to why it went down – or up, where it’s going tomorrow or next week, and why it must crash soon or maybe elevate another couple thousand more points.   Ok, this is fine.   But the next day these same folks may expound theories postulating the opposite.   This proves market pundits have no essential understanding of economics as related to the market.   This proves pundits prefer expedience to understanding.   I am constantly besieged by brokerage firms telling me if I would only invest a million, they would help me reach my goals.   If I had this information, how to make a lot of money, I would borrow every cent I could and apply it to making a bunch of money.   I’d not tell a soul. So, why are they trying to help me?   Well, ...