Skip to main content

Science vs. Creed

Thomas Henry Huxley* (1825-1895) maintained that “Science commits suicide when it adopts a creed**.” 

This is not exactly so.   In the definition cited below, a creed is "A system of belief, principles, or opinions."   Sounds like science to me, though we might better say science is "A system of belief, principles, or opinions supported by evidence."  

To do science and mathematics well does in fact require the scientist to believe in the strongest possible way the present tenets of his/her science.  The science is the creed.  The creed provides the guidance and rails upon which the research proceeds.   Without the firm beliefs in place, the research will flip and flop between competing firmaments.  Nothing happens then.  Seldom does any research project begin with the goal, “I want to prove this or that is wrong.”  That comes much later in the venture – long after the scientist has tried everything to support it and cannot find clear evidence to do so.  Then, the “creed” is lost. 

The progress of physics, chemistry, medicine, biology, and every other science has advanced in precisely this way.  Nonetheless, the vast majority of scientists and more so for mathematicians live within the scientific creed (i.e. education) they first learned.  So very, very few are ever at the forefront of a scientific paradigm shift.

So science is one of those rare subjects with “flex-creeds.”  The scientist must be strong in the faith of the theory’s correctness, but willing and able to abandon it when unsupportable. This elevates science above dogma*** but below continual skepticism, both from which nothing positive emerges.

As to dogma, it may be fair to say that “Science is murdered when it is controlled by a dogma.” 
* See, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Henry_Huxley.  Huxley was regarded as “Darwin’s Bulldog,” for is strong advocacy of the theory of evolution.

**Creed:
  1. A formal statement of religious belief; a confession of faith.
  2. A system of belief, principles, or opinions.
***Dogma:  a belief or set of beliefs that people are expected to accept without asking questions about them

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 
Post a Comment
Read more

Fake News

If you've been following the news the last couple of days, you will note the flurry of copy devoted to fake news.  Both sides are blaming whatever has befallen them the consequence of fake news.  Let's look at this phenomenon a bit.    When I was a student years ago, a friend climbed some mountain in Peru.   A article was written in the local newspaper about the event.   In only three column inches, the newspaper made about six errors.   An easy article to write you say?   Just interview and reproduce.   Yet so many errors?   The question is this: was this fake news or bad reporting?   The idea here is that fake news comes in various flavors. Bad reporting – errors made by the author or editor Opinion presented as news     Deliberate creation of falsehoods to favor a point of view       The reporting of selected truths to favor a particular point of view Now we have the big social media ...
Post a Comment
Read more