Skip to main content

Problem-Solving – Blind Spots


Introduction. In previous chapters, we have talked extensively about problem-solving techniques, and in particular, what can go wrong. Among them are difficulties with the team, the leadership, the problem itself, the problem's multiple solutions, and many others. What we consider here a more personal set of impediments to problem-solving, though they apply to all settings. It is based on research from psychology, cognitive science, my own observations,  and various fields of problem-solving. Call them collectively as your Blind Spots. Here are ten of the most common impediments people face when trying to solve problems. We follow these up with another five, perhaps of lesser importance. As usual, this is not a discussion about math class, where solutions are usually unique, it being a matter of finding it. It is about real-world problems where multiple solutions, bias, and overload are commonplace.

The Top Ten Impediments. At a minimum, everyone should be  aware of these. Knowing risks is part way to avoiding them. Understanding pitfalls helps side-stepping them. For example, rushing to judgment opens the door to missing important alternatives. Allowing bias to creep into the process filters out the correct pathway, sort of like removing roads from a map.

  1. Functional Fixedness: This is the cognitive bias that limits a person to using an object only in the way it is traditionally used. For example, a person might fail to see that a screwdriver can be used as a weight or a doorstop because they are "fixed" on its primary function. It prevents creative, "outside the box" thinking. As well, it is pointless to (try to) think outside the box when you scarcely know what’s “inside the box.”
  2. Lack of Domain Knowledge: It is difficult, if not impossible, to solve a complex problem without a foundational understanding of the relevant subject matter. You cannot solve an advanced physics problem without knowing the basic principles of physics. This is a simple but profound barrier. Learning is work and challenges your mind to absorb more. Thinking you have all the knowledge needed is a mistake of the first order. It is significant to be aware of your unknown knows, that knowledge you have that is wrong. Everyone has these, and they accumulate though sometimes replaced. See Figure 1.

Figure 1  Unknown Knowns

  1. Confirmation Bias: People tend to seek out, interpret, and remember information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs or hypotheses. This can lead to a narrow approach to a problem, where a person ignores or downplays evidence that contradicts their initial idea, preventing them from finding a better solution. Everyone should be aware of the nearly fatal blind spot in their thinking.
  2. Mental Sets: This is a person's tendency to approach a problem in a certain way, often because that approach worked in the past. While experience can be a great asset, a rigid mental set can blind a person to more efficient or effective methods, especially when the current problem is different from past ones. Otherwise referred to as the Theory of Permanence, one tends to return again and again to what they know, and thinks should work again, as it avoids gaining more knowledge. As well, many see that a solution on a small scale should apply to one at a large scale. This is often dead wrong. The teacher of a small class, for example, can give much personal attention to struggling students, but just doubling the class size makes this intractable.
  3. Information Overload: Having too much information can be just as paralyzing as having too little. When faced with a deluge of data, people can struggle to identify what is relevant, leading to analysis paralysis and an inability to make a decision or move forward. Information overload can be overcome with patience and determined hard work, piece by piece. This takes time and patience. Many stock market professionals suffer this problem regularly, relying on only a few data indicators, rules, or reference points, rumors, and tips.
  4. Fear of Failure: A deep-seated fear of making a mistake can prevent a person from even attempting to solve a problem or from taking the necessary risks to find a solution. This fear can lead to procrastination or an over-reliance on familiar but ineffective methods. Fear is an abject form of paralysis, leading some to take on a solution by fiat.
  5. Emotional Impediments: Emotions like anxiety, stress, anger, or frustration can cloud judgment and interfere with rational thought. When a person is emotionally overwhelmed, their ability to think clearly, stay focused, and approach a problem systematically is significantly reduced. Related to bias, they stop problem-solving to hope or even prayer. Even presidents, generals, scientists, and judges suffer emotional impediments.
  6. Poor Problem Framing: How a problem is defined or framed has a massive impact on the solution. A poorly framed problem can lead a person to solve the wrong issue entirely. As well, the lack of problem clarity can have of chasing off in the wrong directions. For example, framing a business problem as a "sales issue" when it is actually a "product quality issue" will lead to wasted effort and a lack of results.
  7. Lack of Metacognition: This is the inability to think about one's own thinking. People who lack metacognition cannot effectively monitor their own problem-solving process. They fail to ask critical questions like, "Is my approach working?" or "What am I missing?" and therefore cannot adapt their strategy. Self-awareness about who you are and what you’re doing or planning to do is crucial.
  8. Impatience and Rushing: Problem-solving, especially for complex issues, often requires a systematic and patient approach. Rushing through the process can lead to skipping crucial steps, overlooking details, and settling for a suboptimal or incomplete solution. In addition, there may occur a rush to the solution. What this means is that in identifying one solution and rushing to announce, the solver may miss other and better solutions to the problem.

Five more impediments. Although the ten impediments above is may be enough, many more have been observed. We offer a short list of five more. These can be of primary importance but are often more secondary. Most of us identify them quickly.

11.  Poor Communication: Problems are often solved in groups, and a lack of clear and effective communication can lead to misunderstandings, duplicated efforts, and the inability to synthesize diverse perspectives into a unified solution.

12.  Lack of Resources: This includes not just financial resources, but also a lack of time, skilled personnel, or access to necessary tools and technology. Without the proper resources, even the most brilliant solution may be impossible to implement.

13.  Improper Incentive Structures: In a professional environment, people may be incentivized to avoid risk or to prioritize short-term gains over a long-term, comprehensive solution. These misaligned incentives can discourage the kind of deep, critical thinking required for solving complex problems.

14.  Cognitive Laziness: The human brain is naturally inclined to seek the path of least resistance. People may opt for a quick and easy solution, even if they know it is not the best one, simply to avoid the mental effort required for a more robust approach. Thinking is hard work, but it must be done.

15.  Attentional Deficit: Not the famous attention deficit syndrome, this is the inability to focus and maintain attention on a single problem for an extended period. It can be a significant barrier. With a constant stream of distractions from technology and multitasking, deep, concentrated problem-solving has become more challenging than ever. Know the times of day you work best, and where you can focus best. (of course, we tell this to students all the time.)

Conclusions. If you’ve made it this far, you may have noticed a few of your personal common impediments to problem-solving. Some of them can render poor solutions or wrong solutions, leading to disaster. The best we can do is know who we are and what proclivities we have amongst this collection of “how can we screw up” items. Find your blind spots. Know your blind spots.

 

©2025 G Donald Allen

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...