Skip to main content

Why Test a Theory?

 More precisely, what are the potential consequences of applying old  theories to new situations without testing them first? The easiest answer is that most of the time, we don’t know it’s a new situation and/or an old theory until it fails. Putting that aside, the consequences are many. Keep in mind, though, sometimes testing is impossible as in some economic or cosmological theories. Testing Einstein’s general theory of relativity had to await instrumentality development that could do so.  Here are some other consequences of failure to test or inappropriate use.



1.      It is a sometimes expensive way to find the old theory needs repair. (Aeronautics, encryption, numerical analysis)

2.      Overgeneralization. (Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs)

3.      It can sometimes cause lives or great damage. (Bridge design, large machinery)

4.      It can make inaccurate predictions and consequent decisions. (Ineffective vaccines, medical procedures, legal or military strategies, climate, AI)

5.      It can lead to a lack of or missing knowledge for decades or more. (Astronomy, Newtonian mechanics)

6.      Selectively interpreting evidence to support a particular viewpoint. (Evolution)

7.      Ignoring counter-evidence. (Economics, Modern Monetary Theory)

8.      Misapplication of context. (Freud psychoanalytic theory)

You could think of it as knowledge growing up and learning by mistakes. You could think of it as parenting and the mistakes made because it didn’t work like the handbook said. You could think of it as normal research and the discovery of new knowledge. Testing or using ideas and theories beyond their scope, for good or bad, is our way of life, and the pathway to new knowledge.

Concomitant with non testing a theory prior to use is using a theory incorrectly. This implies those responsible must fully understand the theory and its limitations. One common such error is that of violating the assumptions underlying the theory.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

  Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1.       Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty.   This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...

Robin Hood and Cliven Bundy

  Actor Herbert Mundin, playing Munch in the 1938 film The Adventures of Robin Hood (starring Errol Flynn) is charged by Prince John's troops of slaying a royal deer in the royal Sherwood forest.  The punishment is death.  Though the events of this film are a portrayal of events dating to the 15th century, they became by the 19th century a "robbing from the rich for the poor" theme so often depicted in other film genres. The William Tell legend is another. The plot is simple.  A poor man desperate to survive tastes the forbidden fruits owned by the authority, and is condemned. I would love to hear this event debated on the current TV news shows.  On the one hand, Munch would be a champion in service to his family.  On the other hand, his legal rights are restricted by legal authority. so, the argument would proceed.  Legal scholars cite statutes chapter and verse, while others would root for the common man.  Fast forward to 2014. Parallels ...