Skip to main content

Advice, Bad Advice, and Damned Advice

 

Advice, Bad Advice, and Damned Advice

Don Allen

 

Everyone gives advice, and almost everyone takes it now and then. Advice, though, is inherently incoherent, inconsistent, and inaccurate.  Now and then, it can be critical. But even the stingiest, coldest, or most loving of us give it freely. A glossary follows but first consider a few examples.

 

·        When you take advice, are you substituting another’s thinking for your own?

·        Sometimes I wish I followed my own advice. But nooooo! I took someone else’s advice. Wrong.

·        When you give advice and someone takes it, then are you not somewhat responsible for outcomes?

·        There have been times I rejected good advice because I didn’t like who was giving it.

·        Companies call in consultants to give advice, but the consultants seldom know the fine points of the business they are advising. People call in psychologists for the same reasons.

·        Ministers and priests are always giving advice, but usually only once a week. Moms and dads give advice, every day if you allow.

·        Schools have many professional advisors on life, but only a few have truly lived.

Glossary

Advice is a suggestion or recommendation offered by someone who should have more experience or knowledge than the person being advised. It can be given on any topic, from personal relationships to career decisions to financial matters.

 

Bad advice is any advice that is not based on sound reasoning or evidence. It can be advice that is harmful, misleading, or simply ineffective. Bad advice can come from anyone, including friends, family, celebrities, and even experts.

 

Damned advice is advice that is unhelpful, harmful, or even dangerous. It can be advice that is based on false information, outdated beliefs, or personal opinions. Damned advice can come from anyone, including friends, family, experts, and even strangers.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

  Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1.       Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty.   This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...

Robin Hood and Cliven Bundy

  Actor Herbert Mundin, playing Munch in the 1938 film The Adventures of Robin Hood (starring Errol Flynn) is charged by Prince John's troops of slaying a royal deer in the royal Sherwood forest.  The punishment is death.  Though the events of this film are a portrayal of events dating to the 15th century, they became by the 19th century a "robbing from the rich for the poor" theme so often depicted in other film genres. The William Tell legend is another. The plot is simple.  A poor man desperate to survive tastes the forbidden fruits owned by the authority, and is condemned. I would love to hear this event debated on the current TV news shows.  On the one hand, Munch would be a champion in service to his family.  On the other hand, his legal rights are restricted by legal authority. so, the argument would proceed.  Legal scholars cite statutes chapter and verse, while others would root for the common man.  Fast forward to 2014. Parallels ...