Skip to main content

Shadows of Time


Time is a really big four-letter word.  We talk about it, write about it, measure it, but really no one quite knows what it is.  Consider by analogy the fish living in water.  Does it know or recognize the water.  For the fish, water is almost unrecognized and surely unknown. Like time is for us.

It is not known whether time has a direction.  This means we don’t know if time is reversible.  Most think time does have the proverbial arrow – no reversal.  Physicists are especially interested in time, and what it means. Railroads live by it.  Airlines mostly ignore it. Doctors never heard of it.

Sometimes what a thing means is reflected in how we use it or modify it, as with an adjective. For time, there is a long list of at least fifty modifiers.  Here are some of them. They betray both our confusion and our understanding of time.  Look at all our needs for this basic quantity/concept in our lives.
ample
 first
 long
 olden
 short
 appointed
 full
 longer
 part
 shorter
 considerable
 future
 longest
 past
 shortest
 difficult
 hard
 lose
 precious
 spare
 down
 hold
 lost
 present
 spend
 due
 idle
 make
 proper
 sufficient
 elapsed
 last
 mean
 reasonable
 third
 enough
 later
 more
 regulate
 tough
 equal
 lead
 much
 same
 valuable
 extra
 less
 next
 second
 waste

Don’t forget “schedule” and “wrong.” There are more...

Now to measure time, we need a lot of descriptors, from nanoseconds to millennia, eons, and epochs. Did you know that scientists don’t know what happens to time when the length you measure is less than 10^(-42) seconds. That would be a micro-micro-micro-micro-micro-micro-micro second.  So, time may be quantum in its nature. No one knows.

In sum, we haven’t defined time per se, we’ve merely looked at its shadows on the wall. Don’t you think it’s “high” time to “take” time to “spend” time to learn more “about” time?

After all, you live in it, or do you swim in it?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

  Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1.       Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty.   This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...

Robin Hood and Cliven Bundy

  Actor Herbert Mundin, playing Munch in the 1938 film The Adventures of Robin Hood (starring Errol Flynn) is charged by Prince John's troops of slaying a royal deer in the royal Sherwood forest.  The punishment is death.  Though the events of this film are a portrayal of events dating to the 15th century, they became by the 19th century a "robbing from the rich for the poor" theme so often depicted in other film genres. The William Tell legend is another. The plot is simple.  A poor man desperate to survive tastes the forbidden fruits owned by the authority, and is condemned. I would love to hear this event debated on the current TV news shows.  On the one hand, Munch would be a champion in service to his family.  On the other hand, his legal rights are restricted by legal authority. so, the argument would proceed.  Legal scholars cite statutes chapter and verse, while others would root for the common man.  Fast forward to 2014. Parallels ...