Skip to main content

Vaccinations - good or bad


Vaccines are here. At first, and with their inventor Pasteur, vaccines were suspect. Then they were accepted. By 1855, the first required vaccines for school children were instituted in Massachusetts. They had a good run, with public trust almost complete.  Then came the first problem with a vaccine that couldn’t track a tricky disease, influenza. Then came a correlation of a vaccine with a worse condition, autism.  Now vaccines again are suspect once again.
  
Case A. We see a decline in flu cases as the use of flu vaccines increase.  Too complicated for many is this simple relation. They see only the first part, the “decline in flu cases,” and so getting the flu vaccine is unnecessary and always inconvenient. So, they don’t. So, more flu cases occur. This initiates a cycle via this simple rule: Fewer flu cases this year implies fewer flu shots next year implies more flu cases. Surprised?

Case B. In another situation, recall the 1998 (false) report that the MMR (Measles-mumps-rubella) vaccine causes autism.  Many “enlightened” parents then declined to have their children so vaccinated. Even after the report was summarily debunked, some parents still continued to deny MMR for their kids. The result was an increase in these diseases in children. 

In the first case we have a false feedback logic and in the second, uninformed reasoning. One problem is that statistical evidence is never 100%.  Give injections of purified water to twenty million and some side effects will occur, statistically insignificant to be sure, but some will read causation in there.  

Currently, required vaccinations for children are true saviors of our very lives:
Diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP)
Inactivated polio vaccine (IPV)
Measles-mumps-rubella (MMR)
Varicella (chickenpox)
Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib)
Pneumococcal conjugate (PCV13)
Hepatitis B (Hep B)
We would be in deep, really deep, trouble if these vaccines required annual booster shots.

The Pros and Cons of vaccinations are well studied.  At the website https://vaccines.procon.org/, you can find a balanced and reasonable set of both. For example, on the pro side, vaccinations have a huge multiplier effect in costs saved and earned.  Money is always big!  As well, general health is strongly supported by vaccinations. However, each pro and each con consumes a full paragraph of information.  Multiply each by ten, and “everyman” becomes overloaded.  What is important these days is that many people will select just one of these and magnify it to become the one and only pro or con, forgetting the others.

Vaccines are not only here, they are here to stay.

BTW. If you have a vaccination preference, you may be called a “vaxxer” or “antivaxxer.”

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

  Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1.       Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty.   This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...
Post a Comment
Read more

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 
Post a Comment
Read more

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...
Post a Comment
Read more