Skip to main content

Opinions in the News

Cable News.  I watch cable news mostly.  You can tell what stations if I tell you the advertisers.  A. Insurance, life, auto, home, all.  B. Drugs, many for unusual conditions. C. Automobiles. D. Weight loss programs – where the food is mailed to you.   High profit products all, I see the same ads dozens of times, ad nauseum  These are actually common to all cable news channels.  

The content is mostly about events, polls, rumors.  Occasionally, there is actual news, like a train derails, or congress passes a bill – rare.   But this is just the filler placed between their favorite offerings, and those are  Opinions.    They come in non-dietetic quantities.  Lumping events, polls, and rumors into “news,”  fake and otherwise, we use the symbol “N.”  Symbolically, this means I/you get daily servings of OAN, or opinions about the news.  This is OK, but the stations, wanting to feed the frenzy of their viewers then move on to OAOAN, or opinions about the opinions about the news.  Sometimes, a side dish of vitriol is measured in.  If that’s not enough, we also have OAOAOAN – you guess it.  

It is endless, it is cyclic, and it’s boring.  But cheap to produce, I’m sure.  Occasionally, after they obsess for  days on one topic, they give it a rest, only for us to see it reborn a week or so later.  So, we get OAOAN, then a delay, with more of the same OAOAN occasionally updated with variations of the same talking points.

Naturally, the “O’s” above cross channel lines, with say the opinions expressed on one channel are about opinions expressed on another.  Crazy?  Yes.


It is doubtful any of these channels makes any converts to their station or to any opinion, preferring to feed an apoplectic audience roughly the same meal 24/7.  Such is the news.  No journalists need apply.  Old style journalism, like congressional compromise are relics of the past, best left to historians.  But wait, history has been infected with opinion as well, though sometimes more subtle.  It is something like an entire generation of historical literature and biography will need correction years from now. 

The tennis channel has more news, though only about tennis.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

  Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1.       Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty.   This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...

Robin Hood and Cliven Bundy

  Actor Herbert Mundin, playing Munch in the 1938 film The Adventures of Robin Hood (starring Errol Flynn) is charged by Prince John's troops of slaying a royal deer in the royal Sherwood forest.  The punishment is death.  Though the events of this film are a portrayal of events dating to the 15th century, they became by the 19th century a "robbing from the rich for the poor" theme so often depicted in other film genres. The William Tell legend is another. The plot is simple.  A poor man desperate to survive tastes the forbidden fruits owned by the authority, and is condemned. I would love to hear this event debated on the current TV news shows.  On the one hand, Munch would be a champion in service to his family.  On the other hand, his legal rights are restricted by legal authority. so, the argument would proceed.  Legal scholars cite statutes chapter and verse, while others would root for the common man.  Fast forward to 2014. Parallels ...