Skip to main content

On Government II






The setting:  The government is an enterprise of millions of employees, led by politicians, who really don’t know how to do anything.  Below them are political appointees, sometimes skilled at something different and at a vastly smaller scale.  Below them are civil servants, who function as highest level operational administrators.  They are normally paid substantially less that commercial counterparts.  Thus, not the highest quality folks are retained.  Below them are the midlevel administrators whose abilities range from very good to terrible, biased toward the lower end.  Since they have total job security, there is little incentive to perform well, even if they could.  This higher level structure diffuses to the entire government enterprise.  Making it bigger will simply require hiring more lower-quality administrators entrusted with higher-level functions.  Will not work.


Government service summary:
At the higher levels: fish out of water
At the lower levels: fish that can’t swim.
------------------------

We are witnessing and are participants in the complete government absorption of the citizenry to some postmodern vision.  It seems to be essentially a non-human super-agency, without sensitivity to the maintenance and long term health and well-being of the populace.

1. The government essentially views itself as if in a cocoon isolated from the world.
2. It is blind to external threats.
3. It assumes that whatever it does, prosperity will sustain. 
4. It cannot comprehend public deterioration from within, whether spiritual, moral, or financial.
5. It views every social or fiscal problem has a regulatory solution.
6. It believes the country it inherited can be fundamentally changed, and vastly improved within its vision.
7. It reacts to problems with solutions without consideration of unintended consequences.  Basically, it treats a symptom of a problem, leaving the problem intact.

------------------

In brief, this monolithic, almost all powerful government seems to be rather naive about the nature of the people it governs.



Gettysburg revisited: Mover over Abe!  It’s official: “Our government by the people, for the people, and of the people…” has been tidied up.  Now it’s “Our government to the people… .”  Said an administration spokesperson, “The original version was too complicated for people to understand.  We have simplified it.  This change will be reflected on all government instruments including the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, DC.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

  Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1.       Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty.   This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...

The Devil and Artificial Intelligence

 In Stephen Vincent Benét’s allegory, The Devil and Daniel Webster , the Devil comes to collect a soul, armed with the fine print of a contract and the inevitability of human weakness. Daniel Webster, the great orator, wins the day not by denying humanity’s flaws, but by appealing to its higher nature. The story warns us about the bargains we make and the price we might pay when power comes too easily. Consider the allegory of Goethe’s “ Faust” as a substitute if Benét’s story is unfamiliar. Today, Artificial Intelligence stands in a position uncannily similar to the Devil in the old tale. It offers dazzling speed, vast knowledge, and seemingly miraculous powers, always at just the right moment when we are tired, overwhelmed, or greedy for an advantage. It whispers I can solve your problems, do your work, make your life easier; just trust me. Playing the role of Daniel Webster is only these few pages, but it is you or me that have signed the contract. The “gifts” AI offers ar...

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...