Skip to main content

Utiopian Worlds



Utopian worlds.  Now. For millions of people, the world is completely safe (or at least a safe place).  Sure, there are threats, but only distant threats or possibilities of distant threats. These people need not be rich.  Many are poor.  Most have a modest income, with housing, with security, few with challenges either to survive, to succeed, other than to enjoy daily safe living.  The recourse to safety and security is significant.  It is foundational as many have noted.  With it, they may operate with impunity, and without it there come suspicion. 

It may be callous to mention that this is precisely the hope promised by most retirement communities.  For the retired, this is a well-deserved world paid for with a lifetime of experience, toil, and savings. It is the dream come true – pardon the age.  It is as near as some get to utopia.  Gone are those cares of their past, of jobs, of homes, including that of survival. Community builders advertise exactly this world, even with the possibilities of new friends and activities built in.  This is also the world for millions of impoverished and younger people securely on welfare, but also with no challenges or problems, given the simple acceptance of a materially reduced life.  

Thus we see utopian worlds of many types, from rich to poor, for any type of religion for most types of politics.  Mostly, the days are routine, unchanging, and unchallenged.  There are few hopes or expectations.  Ambition has atrophied.  Acceptance of the security is sufficient. 

One could view this as an ideal after millennia of painful evolution, the carefree life. 
Such worlds must be inherently unstable, as these people become defenseless, witless,low both in expect and abilities.  Their goods are ripe for seizure. Often the goods are material.  Often there is no resistance.  No one fights a war for more leisure, or more education, or more of anything that requires greater personal efforts upon receipt.  These are modern day utopians. 

The real world exists in a mixed chaos of the utopians and those without.  Any class deemed to have it too good, becomes a target, an easy target.  Whether through ballots or bullets, outsiders want to take the utopia away, and award it to themselves.  This creates a flux that cycles over centuries.
Modern instrumentation, particularly assisted with computers, has accelerated this process.  Only 75 years ago, new devises were sold advertising convenience and time savings.  Utopia is just a few gadgets away became the implication.  Except for the occasional Luddite, the world embraced the “convenient” life affording more time, but to do what?  Not to study and learn, not to build, but more toward the various forms of leisure, from first class travel to endless hours before the television. Rich man, poor man alike.

Now we have computer systems that sell us protection from other computer systems.  We have data systems that release personal information to the world.  We live in an open world where there can be few records beyond discovery.  Our world is less safe on this account[1]. But, we are better assured of flight reservations and departure times[2].  We could argue that because of computers certain facets of our security is declining.  This develops something of a paradox of modern living. 


[1]Safety comes in several forms.  Safe from interlopers but not safe from data miners.
[2] As he sits at Macarren Airport in Las Vegas

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

  Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1.       Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty.   This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...

Robin Hood and Cliven Bundy

  Actor Herbert Mundin, playing Munch in the 1938 film The Adventures of Robin Hood (starring Errol Flynn) is charged by Prince John's troops of slaying a royal deer in the royal Sherwood forest.  The punishment is death.  Though the events of this film are a portrayal of events dating to the 15th century, they became by the 19th century a "robbing from the rich for the poor" theme so often depicted in other film genres. The William Tell legend is another. The plot is simple.  A poor man desperate to survive tastes the forbidden fruits owned by the authority, and is condemned. I would love to hear this event debated on the current TV news shows.  On the one hand, Munch would be a champion in service to his family.  On the other hand, his legal rights are restricted by legal authority. so, the argument would proceed.  Legal scholars cite statutes chapter and verse, while others would root for the common man.  Fast forward to 2014. Parallels ...