Skip to main content

Science vs. Creed

Thomas Henry Huxley* (1825-1895) maintained that “Science commits suicide when it adopts a creed**.” 

This is not exactly so.   In the definition cited below, a creed is "A system of belief, principles, or opinions."   Sounds like science to me, though we might better say science is "A system of belief, principles, or opinions supported by evidence."  

To do science and mathematics well does in fact require the scientist to believe in the strongest possible way the present tenets of his/her science.  The science is the creed.  The creed provides the guidance and rails upon which the research proceeds.   Without the firm beliefs in place, the research will flip and flop between competing firmaments.  Nothing happens then.  Seldom does any research project begin with the goal, “I want to prove this or that is wrong.”  That comes much later in the venture – long after the scientist has tried everything to support it and cannot find clear evidence to do so.  Then, the “creed” is lost. 

The progress of physics, chemistry, medicine, biology, and every other science has advanced in precisely this way.  Nonetheless, the vast majority of scientists and more so for mathematicians live within the scientific creed (i.e. education) they first learned.  So very, very few are ever at the forefront of a scientific paradigm shift.

So science is one of those rare subjects with “flex-creeds.”  The scientist must be strong in the faith of the theory’s correctness, but willing and able to abandon it when unsupportable. This elevates science above dogma*** but below continual skepticism, both from which nothing positive emerges.

As to dogma, it may be fair to say that “Science is murdered when it is controlled by a dogma.” 
* See, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Henry_Huxley.  Huxley was regarded as “Darwin’s Bulldog,” for is strong advocacy of the theory of evolution.

**Creed:
  1. A formal statement of religious belief; a confession of faith.
  2. A system of belief, principles, or opinions.
***Dogma:  a belief or set of beliefs that people are expected to accept without asking questions about them

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

  Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1.       Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty.   This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...
Post a Comment
Read more

Robin Hood and Cliven Bundy

  Actor Herbert Mundin, playing Munch in the 1938 film The Adventures of Robin Hood (starring Errol Flynn) is charged by Prince John's troops of slaying a royal deer in the royal Sherwood forest.  The punishment is death.  Though the events of this film are a portrayal of events dating to the 15th century, they became by the 19th century a "robbing from the rich for the poor" theme so often depicted in other film genres. The William Tell legend is another. The plot is simple.  A poor man desperate to survive tastes the forbidden fruits owned by the authority, and is condemned. I would love to hear this event debated on the current TV news shows.  On the one hand, Munch would be a champion in service to his family.  On the other hand, his legal rights are restricted by legal authority. so, the argument would proceed.  Legal scholars cite statutes chapter and verse, while others would root for the common man.  Fast forward to 2014. Parallels ...
Post a Comment
Read more