Hercule Poirot's warning in Death on the Nile—"Don’t let hate into your heart, or it will make a home there"—serves as a potent allegory for current sociopolitical dynamics. In the public sphere, pervasive hate speech functions as a psychological contagion, eroding the sensibilities of citizens, particularly among the youth who struggle with despair and uncertainty regarding the future. Since violence is the ultimate and most damaging manifestation of hate, any political faction that utilizes rhetoric of resentment and division as its core electoral strategy must recognize the profound civic risk involved. To employ hate is to cultivate a climate conducive to its consequence: violence deliberately. Therefore, the essential prerequisite for reducing social violence is the responsible de-escalation of political polarization and hate speech.
This simmering political-legal stew is a looming danger in the USA. According to the National Center for State Courts (NCSC), nearly two-thirds (63%) of Americans expressed trust and confidence in state courts. Yet, 59% also say the word “political” can be used to describe the courts. In the Illinois situation, the two branches, executive and judicial, are acting in open concert. Pritzker’s political position is obvious, but the courts should at the very least understand the law. They do not. BTW… Confidence in Federal courts is at a historic low (43% on bias), substantially due to the partisan divide. In many states, the court system has become the handmaiden to the governor.